CNN
—
Opening statements might start as early as Thursday within the involuntary manslaughter trial of “Rust” film armorer Hannah Gutierrez Reed within the on-set taking pictures loss of life of cinematographer Halyna Hutchins.
Prosecutors say Gutierrez Reed repeatedly violated security requirements and protocol on the Western film’s New Mexico set, resulting in Hutchins’ loss of life when she was struck by a reside spherical of ammunition fired from a prop gun held by actor Alec Baldwin.
Twelve jurors – seven males and 5 girls – will now determine whether or not 26-year-old Gutierrez Reed, who was additionally the movie’s key props assistant, is liable for the killing.
Gutierrez Reed has been charged with two counts of involuntary manslaughter “in the alternative” for the October 2021 taking pictures, that means jurors won’t solely need to determine whether or not she is responsible, but in addition underneath which authorized definition of the state’s two varieties of involuntary manslaughter.
Prosecutors have additionally charged her with tampering with proof, alleging she transferred a “small bag of cocaine” to another person after getting back from a police interview on the day of the taking pictures.
Gutierrez Reed has pleaded not responsible to all counts. If convicted, she faces as much as 18 months in jail and a $5,000 fantastic for each count. The trial is anticipated to last about two weeks.
She would be the first individual to face trial in what has been a sophisticated case that has highlighted the movie industry’s safety standards – and this specific set’s violations of them.
Prosecutors have alleged Gutierrez Reed repeatedly violated security protocols and uncared for her duties main as much as the taking pictures on October 21, 2021, together with failing to carry out security checks on the prop weapon and the ammunition she loaded it with, handing it to a employees member who shouldn’t have been dealing with weapons on set after which departing from the realm she ought to have been supervising when Baldwin in the end fired the deadly spherical. Her actions, prosecutors say, straight led to 42-year-old Hutchins’ loss of life.
However protection attorneys have known as the taking pictures a tragic accident and have accused the state of attempting to smear Gutierrez Reed’s reputation to try to bolster a politically-motivated prosecution. Her protection says reside rounds should never have been on the set and that she carried out her security duties. They’ve pointed to different members of the manufacturing who bore duty for what passed off on set, together with the film’s assistant director, who handed Baldwin the loaded gun and took a plea deal within the case final 12 months.
Individually, Baldwin can be anticipated to face trial on an involuntary manslaughter cost in reference to the killing. He has pleaded not guilty and has previously said he didn’t pull the trigger.
In a possible trigger assertion filed in January 2023, prosecutors alleged the armorer loaded a prop firearm and saved the weapon throughout a lunch break within the set’s prop truck protected with out first unloading it, as is correct security protocol for dummy rounds. “Dummy” rounds check with ammunition that comprises no explosive parts however seems as if it was an actual bullet when fired.
In line with the possible trigger assertion, Gutierrez Reed additionally left a cart that contained ammunition unsecured and unsupervised throughout the break.
Gutierrez Reed didn’t carry out a security test of the weapon after the break and didn’t observe security procedures, in line with the assertion. She handed the weapon to assistant movie director David Halls, whose position on set is “prohibited and/or strictly discouraged from dealing with any of the firearms,” in line with prosecutors. Gutierrez Reed then left the realm, once more violating security protocol, prosecutors allege.
Gutierrez Reed’s lawyer, Jason Bowles, previously told NBC his shopper had loaded the gun with what she believed had been dummy rounds earlier than Baldwin used it on set, saying she retrieved them from a field that was labeled “dummy.”
“She loaded rounds from that field into the handgun solely to later discover out – and he or she had no thought, she inspected the rounds – that there was a reside spherical,” Bowles said at the time. Gutierrez Reed sued the movie’s gun and ammunition supplier in January 2022, alleging they bought her a cache of dummy ammunition that had reside rounds blended in.
Whereas prosecutors have alleged Gutierrez Reed didn’t take out every spherical and present it to Baldwin and Halls as per protocol to make sure they weren’t reside rounds, Bowles told NBC she spun the gun chamber for Halls and confirmed him “each spherical in that chamber.”
“There have been six dummy rounds, she believed, to be in that handgun,” he advised NBC, noting dummy rounds look like live rounds.
Gutierrez Reed was not within the space the place Baldwin was rehearsing on the time of the taking pictures as a result of the gathering was simply purported to be technical preparation, which might not require her presence, her attorneys have previously said.
Halls, who obtained the firearm from Gutierrez Reed shortly earlier than the taking pictures that day, yelled “cold gun” earlier than Baldwin fired the weapon – a comment meant to point the firearm didn’t have any reside rounds in it, in line with an affidavit filed by the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Workplace and obtained by CNN affiliate KOAT.
Halls – who CNN has reported was beforehand the topic of security complaints in different productions – didn’t know there have been reside rounds contained in the gun, in line with the affidavit.
Halls took a plea deal in 2023 for his position within the taking pictures, pleading no contest to 1 rely of negligent use of a lethal weapon, in line with the Los Angeles Times. He was sentenced to 6 months of unsupervised probation, a $500 fantastic, needed to take part in a firearms security class, full 24 hours of neighborhood service and never use medicine or alcohol, in line with the Occasions.
Halls’ lawyer, Lisa Torraco, launched a press release on the time in protection of her shopper. “Absent no prices in any respect, that is the most effective consequence for Mr. Halls and the case,” Torraco stated. “He can now put this matter behind him and permit the main target of this tragedy to be on the taking pictures victims and altering the business so this sort of accident won’t ever occur once more.”
In line with the possible trigger assertion, Baldwin had been practising for a scene and was drawing and pointing the weapon with steering from Hutchins and Joel Souza, the movie’s director.
Baldwin drew the revolver, pointed it at Hutchins and fired the weapon shortly earlier than 2 p.m., hanging her within the chest and injuring Souza, prosecutors stated within the possible trigger assertion. Hutchins was pronounced lifeless simply after 3:30 p.m. that day.
Within the possible trigger assertion, prosecutors alleged Gutierrez Reed “didn’t mitigate or tackle a number of vital security violations, questions of safety, protocol violation(s) and/or issues that resulted in a number of famous cases of recklessness main as much as, contributing to, and inflicting the deadly taking pictures.”
5 reside rounds and one extra, spent, reside spherical had been retrieved from the set by investigators, in line with the assertion.
“Essentially the most egregious incident(s) of a reckless violation of security and armorer duties is to permit reside ammunition on and even close to a movie set the place firearms are getting used,” prosecutors stated within the assertion. “Reed ought to have caught this reside ammunition on set however put everybody on the Rust set at risk by failing to do her job.”
A authorities report printed roughly six months after the taking pictures painted a picture of a much larger problem, noting the “Rust” film set “willfully violated” security guidelines and “demonstrated plain indifference to worker security.”
Gun security procedures weren’t being adopted on set, the report stated, and the movie’s administration staff knew it and didn’t right it.
Rust Film Productions, LLC was fined practically $137,000 – the utmost allowed by New Mexico regulation – and issued the highest-level quotation for his or her actions.
On the time, Melina Spadone, an lawyer for Rust Film Productions, stated: “We’re happy to have entered into an settlement with OHSB, topic to approval, which downgrades the quotation and reduces penalties. Our prime precedence has at all times been resuming manufacturing and finishing this movie so we will honor the life and work of Halyna Hutchins. Settling this case moderately than litigating is how we will greatest transfer ahead to attain that aim.”
Prosecutors have also alleged an unnamed witness stated Gutierrez Reed transferred a small bag of cocaine to them on the day of the taking pictures, after getting back from an interview on the police station.
Prosecutors stated that transfer recommended she made the switch to “keep away from prosecution and stop regulation enforcement from acquiring extremely inculpatory proof straight associated to the defendant’s dealing with of the firearm and the circumstances of the deadly taking pictures.”
Bowles known as the cost “character assassination,” telling CNN in June 2023 there was no “precise proof of something,” and questioned the witness who “instantly seems 20 months later.”
The protection lawyer responded equally when, weeks earlier, prosecutors had alleged his shopper had been “ingesting closely and smoking marijuana within the night throughout the taking pictures of Rust,” and stated she was probably hungover when she positioned a reside bullet into the prop firearm.
“The prosecution has so mishandled this case and the case is so weak that they’re now resorting to character assassination ways to additional taint the jury pool,” Bowles told CNN at the time.
“This investigation and prosecution has not been about searching for Justice; for them it’s been about discovering a handy scapegoat.”
CNN’s Josh Campbell contributed to this report.