Philadelphia man incarcerated as a teen is freed after more than a dozen years in prison

nexninja
16 Min Read


Philadelphia
CNN
 — 

C.J. Rice is a free man, and as of Monday morning the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania formally considers him legally harmless of the crime he was convicted of in 2013.

This morning, Choose James Eisenhower, in room 805 within the Felony Justice Middle in Philadelphia, granted the movement supplied by District Lawyer Larry Krasner to drop all fees towards Rice for a 2011 capturing that despatched him to jail for greater than a dozen years for a criminal offense he insists he didn’t and couldn’t have bodily dedicated.

Rice’s protection counsel — Karl Schwartz and Amelia Maxfield, who efficiently filed the habeas petition to get Rice out of jail and have his conviction overturned — can now pursue having his felony report expunged of tried homicide fees.

“For me personally, I’m glad to see this improper righted,” Rice informed CNN. “Can’t name it a mistake. As a result of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania’s judicial system had not less than 5 separate instances to appropriate this particular scenario, and selected to not act within the curiosity of justice. Both the Courtroom didn’t overview the case as the general public belief endowed the court docket the flexibility to take action, or the Pennsylvania Courts did overview the case and selected to permit a transparent injustice to face for so long as nobody else knew what was happening. For that, the Pennsylvania Courtroom system is blameworthy and never worthy of any confidence. Nonetheless, my remark to any DA, state, prosecutor, commonwealth who has an harmless individual behind bars, allow them to free!”

Rice’s launch was greater than a dozen years within the making. We informed you about his case on CNN and in a cover story in The Atlantic in October 2022, which famous the numerous methods Rice didn’t have efficient counsel when the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania sentenced him to jail for 30 to 60 years for the 2011 capturing.

I used to be first alerted to the Rice case by my father, Dr. Theodore S. Tapper, who was Rice’s pediatrician in 2011 and who testified that he didn’t imagine the then-17-year-old Rice was bodily able to finishing up the 2011 capturing, provided that he was recovering from a separate capturing on the time and will barely stroll, a lot much less run, because the shooters have been described as having achieved.

In 2016, Rice requested my father to assist him receive medical information from his capturing that have been by no means launched at trial, information that confirmed he had a shattered pelvis on the time he was supposedly operating whereas committing the crime. A correspondence between Rice and Dr. Tapper started, one which resulted in my father hiring attorneys to assist Rice and getting me focused on overlaying the story.

“The ruling this morning was the proper one – besides C.J. by no means ought to have been charged with any crime within the first place,” Dr. Tapper informed me. “He’s been locked up by the commonwealth of Pennsylvania for 12 years for a criminal offense he had nothing to do with. The authorized system churns by itself merry means and justice is seldom discovered. C.J. now has an opportunity to start out constructing a life, 12 years of which have been taken away from him with none compensation. Because the title of a narrative about his case in The Atlantic says: This isn’t justice.”

After we coated Rice’s story, Rice’s new lawyer, Schwartz, filed a habeas petition in December 2022, which particularly argued that Rice’s lawyer incompetently stipulated to proof that offered a motive for the charged shootings. Habeas corpus is a authorized precept that enables individuals who imagine they’re being held unlawfully in jail or detention to problem it.

One 12 months later, Choose Nitza I. Quiñones Alejandro, United States district decide for the Japanese District of Pennsylvania, granted Rice’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, discovering that Rice’s “trial counsel rendered ineffective help,” overturning his conviction and ordering that Pennsylvania resolve whether or not to retry him or free him inside 180 days.

Main as much as dropping his fees right this moment, Krasner’s workplace in September acknowledged that Rice didn’t have enough counsel. Krasner’s sentencing overview committee, after reviewing and investigating the small print of the case, advisable that Pennsylvania drop the case towards Rice, believing that they might not persuade a jury to imagine he dedicated the September 25, 2011, capturing past an affordable doubt, a supply with the workplace informed CNN.

The DA’s workplace has acknowledged in current months that the case dealt with by prior prosecutors was weak from the beginning and that there wasn’t a lot precise proof tying Rice to the crime. “The factor that probably resulted in his conviction was that his protection council was so ineffective,” the DA supply informed CNN.

This can be very uncommon for a court docket to grant a habeas petition primarily based on arguments coping with a defendant’s proper to enough counsel. Earlier increased courts have denied many such efforts in different circumstances, successfully green-lighting protection attorneys who have been asleep throughout a part of a shopper’s cross-examination, arrested for drunken driving on the way in which to court docket, mentally unstable, and even disbarred halfway by way of the trial. In 2022, the US Supreme Courtroom took steps to make it much more troublesome for a defendant to assert insufficient counsel. Rice’s case getting overturned is an anomaly.

“Greater than something we’re extremely glad that this harmless fellow citizen has lastly been granted his long-overdue exoneration and freedom,” Schwartz mentioned in an announcement. “His indomitable spirit and resolute perception that he can be exonerated all through his unjust incarceration was awe-inspiring.”

The fundamentals of the story are as follows: Rice had been shot in September 2011, and after he was launched, he noticed his pediatrician, Dr. Tapper. Rice might barely stroll. Days later, a separate household was shot at on a road in South Philadelphia, inflicting damage however fortunately no deaths or severe damage. Witnesses described one or two males who fired after which ran away.

That evening, no suspects have been recognized, despite the fact that the victims had recognized Rice for years. The subsequent day, nonetheless, after police claimed that they had obtained an nameless tip, the police re-interviewed the victims and out of the blue one picked out Rice as one of many shooters in a photograph lineup. There isn’t any recording and even detailed notes of the dialog by which she picked out Rice. The Philadelphia police have since modified procedures relating to police lineups.

The court docket appointed Sandjai Weaver to characterize Rice. Weaver, our investigation found, was an overworked, underpaid protection lawyer who behaved incompetently and made mistake after mistake in her insufficient protection of Rice, who was convicted in 2013 and sentenced to 30 to 60 years in jail for a criminal offense by which nobody was even severely injured. Rice’s co-defendant, who had a special lawyer, was acquitted in the identical trial. Weaver died in 2019.

Weaver “allowed issues to return into proof earlier than the jury that shouldn’t have,” the DA supply mentioned, “particularly the concept Rice was taking part in retaliation as a result of he had been shot a pair weeks prior.”

Neither the DA on the time nor the Philadelphia police had proof connecting these two crimes, the supply famous. Neither is there any proof that Rice was a member of a neighborhood Philadelphia gang, as had additionally been admitted into proof, although “any competent protection lawyer would have fought vigorously towards permitting that info to be put earlier than the jury,” the DA supply mentioned. “Even the decide puzzled about admitting it.”

However Weaver didn’t object.

“It was positively prejudicial,” the supply mentioned. “We predict it resulted in his conviction versus his co-defendant, who was acquitted.”

The one proof towards Rice was eyewitness testimony from one of many capturing victims, who for the reason that 2013 trial has proved to be uncooperative with the DA’s workplace, additionally making any new prosecution of Rice unlikely to succeed.

Although the witness knew Rice, she didn’t establish him the evening of the capturing in three separate conversations with police. Weaver didn’t level that out in trial.

Even there, nonetheless, the witness’ testimony would probably not stand as much as any first rate protection lawyer, the DA’s workplace believes. The witness claimed Rice’s lengthy braids have been visibly coming out in entrance of his face from below a hoodie when he attacked them. However when Rice turned himself in to police on the finish of September 2011, his hair was in tight, however fraying, cornrows. The DA’s workplace consulted with people who had had such hairstyles and authorized hairstylists, and concluded that from images, his hair had been in cornrows for roughly 3 to 4 weeks when he turned himself in, the DA supply mentioned. Due to this fact, the witness’ reminiscence of his lengthy braids didn’t match what he appeared like. (He did have lengthy braids within the picture from the police lineup, from a months-earlier reserving picture for a drug cost, it could be famous.)

“If we retried him, all that proof would are available and the jury would probably have doubts,” the DA supply mentioned.

One other a part of the DA’s investigation helped them arrive at this resolution. Rice says that when he turned himself into police, he additionally turned in his cellphone, and assumed police would examine telephone information and see that he was in West Philadelphia on the time of the crime, not South Philadelphia the place the capturing passed off. There aren’t any information that the police ever subpoenaed the telephone information.

Rice mentioned he repeatedly requested his lawyer, Weaver, to pursue such information. However she by no means did. However the district lawyer’s workplace, listening to previous, recorded courthouse telephone name conversations, heard Rice on tape beseeching his mom to get Weaver to pursue the telephone information in order to show his alibi for the crime he didn’t commit.

Krasner’s workplace additionally famous that Rice’s mom, Crystal Cooper, labored on the DA’s workplace on the time and was basically proven the door and given one other job as soon as her son was arrested.

Had this occurred right this moment, the supply mentioned the workplace would have supplied oblique help, by ensuring Rice had entry to first rate protection counsel, and would have reviewed the case for battle, presumably sending it to the Pennsylvania lawyer normal.

“That’s not how we’d deal with an worker right this moment,” the supply mentioned. “Rice would after all have the presumption of innocence and we’d not terminate her.”

There have been any variety of errors Weaver made, however Schwartz’s petition centered on Weaver agreeing to stipulate “to an in any other case inadmissible indisputable fact that established a motive for Rice to commit the crime.”

“The prosecution’s idea was that the capturing was retaliation towards one of many victims for capturing Rice three weeks earlier. Nonetheless, neither the police nor the prosecutor might provide any concrete proof supporting the sufferer’s culpability for the sooner capturing, and the trial court docket was ready to exclude the motive proof for being extra prejudicial than probative,” Schwartz wrote.

“As an alternative, on the morning of trial, Rice’s counsel stipulated that the proof might are available. Trial counsel’s resolution to comply with that stipulation was objectively unreasonable, because the proof was in any other case inadmissible and solely might have harm her shopper.”

Along with Schwartz, Maxfield and Nilam Sanghvi of the Pennsylvania Innocence Challenge, former Solicitor Basic Donald Verrilli, and lawyer Ginger Anders of Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP all joined the trouble to free Rice.

In response to the petition, Assistant District Lawyer Peter Andrews acknowledged final fall that Rice was not offered the rights afforded below the Sixth Modification to the US Structure, which ensures a defendant’s proper to counsel. He mentioned that the insufficient counsel meant Rice was “due habeas aid” – a basic proper elsewhere within the Structure that protects towards illegal and indefinite imprisonment.

Due to this, Andrews wrote, “the Commonwealth respectfully requests that the Courtroom grant a conditional writ of habeas corpus and order that Rice be retried inside 180 days or launched from custody.”

These 180 days at the moment are up, and Rice is now not in jail after greater than a dozen years.

“The issues that led to C.J.’s wrongful conviction – unreliable eyewitnesses, ineffective help of counsel, and a poor police investigation – infect so many circumstances in Philadelphia and throughout the nation,” mentioned Maxfield, now an lawyer on the Exoneration Challenge. “We’re so completely happy that C.J. is dwelling and free, and we sit up for persevering with to struggle for many who are usually not.”

CNN’s Jeremy Herb contributed to this report.

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *