A model of this story appeared in CNN’s What Issues publication. To get it in your inbox, join free here.
CNN
—
Former President Donald Trump and his working mate JD Vance had been each requested basically the identical query whereas hundreds of miles aside this week:
How would they convey down the price of baby care, which is a barrier to individuals having youngsters and a serious drain on dad and mom?
Provided that the Republican ticket is constructed across the thought of reversing inflation and interesting to “actual” People, and that Vance specifically has argued, joking or not, that “childless cat ladies” are a menace to American democracy, it looks like the type of topic for which they’d have one thing to say.
However the two males gave remarkably completely different solutions, neither of which appear prone to deliver down the price of baby care.
Vance, talking to a conservative activist at an Arizona church on Wednesday, thinks dad and mom ought to look to grandparents, aunts and uncles for many who have them, and in addition advised reducing down on coaching and certification necessities for day care employees. That reply, at the very least, focuses on the difficulty at hand, however it received’t fulfill any father or mother or potential dad and mom who don’t stay close to their prolonged household or whose prolonged household can’t afford to work free of charge.
What got here out of Trump’s mouth, nonetheless, in his discuss with the Financial Membership of New York on Thursday, was not a direct reply about baby care, which he dismissed as finally not a really massive downside and never that costly to repair in contrast with the cash he’ll elevate from tariffs.
You possibly can charitably say that he pivoted from the kid care query again to his speaking factors for the day, which needed to do along with his plan to position taxes, often known as tariffs, on all imports coming into the US.
Nevertheless, you probably have spent any time in current months listening to Trump’s phrases in depth – and in case you haven’t, it’s best to – his speech on the Republican Nationwide Conference, as an example, veered from ready remarks to wandering musings.
On Friday, he devoted a lot of a information convention in New York about his authorized issues to a recounting of old sexual misconduct allegations he has denied. It had the impact of reminding individuals concerning the allegations.
His response to the kid care query, the topic of some ribbing by his political opponents, might precisely be described as a ramble with out a solution. It’s value wanting nearer at a difficulty that impacts so many People.
For extra context, CNN’s Tami Luhby appeared on the broad strokes of Trump’s normal declare, that the brand new tariffs can pay for People’ baby care, and located it’s not in any respect clear how that will work. Read Luhby’s report.
The kid care query was put to Trump by Reshma Saujani, founding father of Mothers First and Ladies Who Code. Spoiler alert: Saujani was not happy with what Trump needed to say.
“I don’t even assume he’s really considered this, and oldsters are struggling,” she later said on TikTok, arguing households are being crushed by the price of baby care.
Whereas she won’t have been anticipating a lot from Trump’s reply, the query as she posed it on stage was detailed and in no way partisan. Right here’s what she mentioned:
Saujani is generally proper on her details. That $122 billion determine comes from a 2023 examine by the nonpartisan nonprofit group Council for a Strong America. Luhby reported in May about one other report that present in 11 states and Washington, DC, dad and mom with two youngsters in a baby care middle might anticipate to pay at the very least twice as a lot for baby care as for typical lease. CNN’s Matt Egan has additionally reported on the child care crisis.
So, this isn’t a brand new difficulty. However right here’s what Trump needed to say:
Trump’s off to a superb begin right here. When she labored within the White Home, his daughter Ivanka did assist add provisions to Trump’s tax minimize legislation that doubled the child tax credit to $2,000 per baby for hundreds of thousands of People, in line with a CNN truth examine.
Nevertheless, these will increase weren’t granted to the hundreds of thousands of kids whose dad and mom don’t make sufficient to pay revenue tax. Democrats would later additional develop the kid tax credit score by as much as an extra $1,600 and in addition gave the credit score as money even to households who don’t pay revenue taxes. That further bump and increasing it to all dad and mom was credited with reducing the kid poverty fee almost in half in 2021. However Democrats did not get the votes for a longer-term enlargement of that experiment.
Vice President Kamala Harris has promised to attempt to completely lengthen and develop that credit score, and Vance, not the Trump marketing campaign, has additionally advised he helps an enlargement, however details are sketchy.
Even Trump’s doubling of the credit score to $2,000 is ready to run out subsequent yr, so this can be a key difficulty for whoever wins the White Home. Luhby has written extensively about the child tax credit.
That is the place Trump stops making a lot sense:
Sure, you do need to have baby care. However what are these numbers he’s speaking about?
So Trump has moved from the price of baby care to the taxes – tariffs – he plans to impose on imports.
Egan has written concerning the widely held fear among economists that Trump’s proposal to position a brand new 60% tariff tax on items from China and a ten% across-the-board tariff on items from different nations would principally simply be handed alongside to customers and never exchange revenue tax for the federal government. Trump’s not listening to these warnings.
Hear that, dad and mom? The price of baby care is small change in contrast with all the cash the US goes to be bringing in from Trump’s tariffs. What you’re not listening to is a concrete proposal for a tax credit score or a program to rework these tariff {dollars} Trump is bound the US authorities can be swimming in into assist for affording baby care.
Repeat: Youngster care – really not very costly, per Trump.
Yep. Superb query.