Editor’s Word: The CNN Unique Collection “Secrets & Spies: A Nuclear Game” examines the tenuous world geopolitics through the Chilly Struggle by way of the lens of two infamous double brokers: Oleg Gordievsky and Aldrich Ames. The four-part sequence is airing Sundays at 10 pm ET/PT on CNN.
CNN
—
In November 1983, the US, Soviet Union and the remainder of the world have been teetering nearer than ever on the sting of nuclear conflict. A NATO navy train had spooked the Soviets, who thought the exercise was merely a canopy for an actual nuclear strike on the USSR, prompting them to prepared their very own nuclear forces.
Who knew, then, that an ABC movie-of-the-week would play a major function in probably stopping nuclear conflict?
“The Day After,” a two-hour epic following just a few weeks within the lives of small-town Midwesterners earlier than and after a nuclear strike, was one of the crucial controversial and most-watched TV films when it aired on November 20, 1983.
In its first hour, the folks of Lawrence, Kansas, go about their lives as the specter of nuclear conflict looms. However when the nuke lastly involves Kansas, the devastation is instant: Acres of crops are singed and poisoned, houses are leveled, a fifth-grade class is vaporized in school.
Characters we come to know within the movie’s first half are obliterated immediately or barely clinging to life as they succumb to radiation poisoning. Even those that survive the assault by the movie’s finish will quickly die, viewers know.
It’s an uneasy watch now, however “The Day After” was much more affecting when nuclear conflict was on the desk and high of thoughts. It’s nonetheless one of many most-watched TV occasions in US historical past –– greater than 100 million viewers tuned into its unique broadcast, more half of the country’s adult population on the time. What’s extra, it’s credited with altering then-President Ronald Reagan’s thoughts towards nuclear conflict.
Getting “The Day After” to air, although, was fraught. Even Reagan, who praised the movie in his personal writings, didn’t agree with its bleak and upsetting depiction of nuclear aftermath.
However the group who created it knew it may very well be essential, so, after rejecting requests for edits, dodging complaints from conservative teams and acquiescing to the occasional community demand, “The Day After” lastly made it to TV and adjusted the historical past of the medium –– and probably the world.
“There have been all these behind the scenes (challenges) occurring, which we engaged on the movie by no means actually knew on the time,” stated Jack Wright, an emeritus professor of theater on the College of Kansas and head of native casting on “The Day After,” in an interview with CNN. “It’s superb that the movie got here out as sturdy because it did.”
“The Day After” ends with a written warning to the viewers: “The catastrophic occasions you could have simply witnessed are, in all probability, much less extreme than the destruction that might truly happen within the occasion of a full nuclear strike towards the USA.”
As a made-for-TV film airing in a primetime Sunday evening slot, “The Day After” couldn’t depict true nuclear horror, although there have been nonetheless stunning scenes of mass demise and the aftermath of a crumbling society.
That was the purpose, director Nicholas Meyer stated.
“I needed to make it like a public service announcement,” Meyer stated within the 2022 documentary “Tv Occasion,” in regards to the tumultuous manufacturing of the movie.
The script was sparse and plain. Early scenes embrace a gathering at an artwork museum between a health care provider and his daughter with plans to depart Kansas and a romantic tryst between a younger couple days from getting married. We meet husbands, wives, their kids and mates in order that after they’re ripped away from one another within the second half, their loss will really feel virtually as sudden as it will if an actual nuclear occasion had separated them.
Wright was tasked with casting 1000’s of extras from Lawrence. In a single pivotal scene, greater than 1,000 Lawrence locals have been made to lie on cots within the College of Kansas’ basketball area, carrying tattered garments and bearing bloody facial accidents as if they’d barely survived the nuclear assault. The depth of the scenes impressed the solid to debate what they’d do within the occasion of nuclear conflict, he stated.
“Everytime you’re coping with that sort of material, it sticks in your craw,” Wright stated.
After seeing tough cuts of the movie, although, the community thought it was a bit too devastating. Executives had notes: No blood, no scarring, no burning, stated “The Day After” producer Bob Papazian within the documentary “Tv Occasion.”
Many scenes have been altered consequently: An extended shot of a household burning to demise because the nuclear bombs fell, as seen in “Tv Occasion,” was scrapped, as have been pictures that targeted on survivors’ melting pores and skin or victims’ charred corpses.
“You needed to stroll a positive line with this film,” Meyer told the Define in 2017. “Individuals have a distant management of their fingers. So we needed to make a film that conveyed the awfulness of nuclear conflict with out making it so terrible that you just modified the channel.”
Stephanie Austin, an affiliate producer on the movie, carried out intensive analysis on the devastation in locations the place nuclear bombs have been dropped, like Hiroshima. After the bombing there, a lot of the land was leveled. The community requested that “The Day After” keep away from displaying the acute destruction that was nearer to actuality.
“I assumed we stopped in need of telling the true reality,” Austin stated in “Tv Occasion.”
Lawrence locals have been largely unaware of the drama brewing behind the scenes and have been extra excited in regards to the prospect of constructing a film, Wright stated.
“One thing like this had by no means been accomplished earlier than,” Wright instructed CNN of the movie. “We have been all simply enjoying it by ear. It was superb to all of us.”
Earlier than “The Day After” aired, Reagan’s coverage concerned investing much more in US defenses, together with a missile protect proposed to guard the US from a Soviet assault. However scaling up defenses solely heightened tensions with the Soviets, who seen Reagan’s Strategic Protection Initiative as a risk to their very own safety.
On October 10, whereas at Camp David, Reagan watched “The Day After,” weeks earlier than it will air on TV. The movie, he wrote in his diary, “left (him) enormously depressed.”
“Whether or not it will likely be of assist to the ‘anti nukes’ or not, I cant (sic) say,” Reagan wrote of the movie’s potential impression on disarmament supporters. “My very own response was certainly one of our having to do all we are able to to have a deterrent & to see there may be by no means a nuclear conflict.”
The historical past of the Chilly Struggle
Although “The Day After” resonated deeply with Reagan, his administration requested ABC to make a number of edits to the movie to make it much less upsetting for viewers, former ABC Movement Photos president Brandon Stoddard stated in an interview with the Tv Academy Basis.
Conservative teams, too, had seen the movie as a possible risk to assist for nuclear deterrence, or the coverage of letting the nukes do the speaking: Their very existence and the potential to make use of them was meant to forestall the USSR and different international locations from launching their very own nuclear weapons.
The conservative outlet Human Occasions declared “The Day After” to be a “propaganda spectacular” over a month earlier than it even aired, and others carried out letter-writing campaigns to influence advertisers to not purchase advert time through the movie, the New York Instances reported in October 1983.
ABC refused to acknowledge desired cuts and complaints from the Reagan administration or conservative watchdogs, and the movie aired its unique two-hour reduce simply days earlier than Thanksgiving in November 1983.
In Reagan’s 1984 State of the Union handle, which got here two months after “The Day After” aired, Reagan lastly dedicated to stopping nuclear conflict fairly than tease situations of survivability: “To protect our civilization on this trendy age, a nuclear conflict can’t be gained and mustn’t ever be fought.”
Three years later, Reagan would signal the Intermediate-Vary Nuclear Forces Treaty, which noticed the US decide to decreasing its arsenal of nuclear arms.
Earlier than “The Day After” had even been accomplished, there have been considerations about its graphic content material. Stoddard, who died in 2014, was determined that ABC would air the movie anyway. He stated within the Tv Academy interview that he was the one who needed to pursue a movie about nuclear conflict within the first place –– however advertisers have been getting chilly ft.
A couple of weeks earlier than “The Day After” aired, the New York Instances published a narrative about psychologists warning households that the movie may probably devastate younger viewers and that kids below 12 shouldn’t watch it.
”I worry kids may have nightmares in regards to the present and fear about it for weeks and even months,” one psychologist instructed the Instances. “Older kids and adults could have a way of hopelessness.”
Fearing that “The Day After” may isolate giant swaths of viewers who didn’t wish to witness its bleak depiction of nuclear horror, firms largely resisted shopping for advert area. Corporations additionally fearful that their merchandise could be related to scenes of the destroyed Heartland or vaporized lecture rooms.
To assuage advertisers, ABC allowed most firms to air their commercials through the first half of the movie, earlier than nuclear conflict got here to Kansas, UPI reported after “The Day After” aired in 1983. That method, Orville Redenbacher may hawk popcorn earlier than any graphic deaths occurred.
It was a great deal for the businesses, Stoddard stated: Since ABC had such bother discovering advertisers, it offered spots for as little as $11,000 –– adverts that have been ultimately seen by an viewers of 100 million.
“The Day After” was upsetting, as psychologists warned, but additionally galvanizing.
“I vastly underestimated the significance of ‘The Day After,’” stated Kenneth Adelman, the previous director of the Arms Management and Disarmament Company below Reagan, in “Tv Occasion.”
“The Day After” introduced dialogue of nuclear conflict and the potential for disarmament to thousands and thousands of people that seen it, and have become the uncommon movie that “truly turned historic textual content fairly than vice versa,” wrote William Palmer, a Purdue College professor who mentioned its impression in “Movies of the Eighties: A Social Historical past.”
“From its earliest frames, ‘The Day After’ units out to take away the blinders from an uninvolved American populace,” Palmer wrote.
“The Day After” endures at this time as an artifact of a tense time and a strong piece of artwork that modified minds and even influenced coverage adjustments. By making it, the Los Angeles Instances’ Tim Grierson wrote final yr, Meyer and his group helped “save the world.”
Correction: This text has been up to date to right the primary identify of former ABC Movement Photos president Brandon Stoddard.