CNN
—
When prosecutors make their closing pitch Tuesday to New York jurors for why they need to convict former President Donald Trump of a slew of enterprise crimes, they’ll face the burdensome activity of weaving collectively weeks of testimony and proof they are saying proves Trump dedicated felonies to assist his 2016 presidential marketing campaign.
The closing arguments in Trump’s historic hush cash legal case will give prosecutors from District Lawyer Alvin Bragg’s workplace a possibility to elucidate to the 12 jurors how every witness they known as and piece of proof they introduced bolsters their case for a responsible verdict on 34 felony counts of falsifying enterprise data.
That was already going to be a sophisticated activity for a trial that’s been underway since mid-April and incessantly featured witnesses going over the dry particulars of enterprise recordkeeping and different mundane testimony. However prosecutors can have an additional diploma of issue with an extended break forward of closing arguments, as jurors can have been away from the case since Tuesday.
“There’s loads of moments throughout trial the place you’re getting a chunk of testimony otherwise you’re introducing a doc or different exhibit, and the jury is considering, ‘Effectively, how does this slot in?’ That’s unavoidable. It’s your job at closing to weave all of it collectively, and to make it make sense. And in order that shall be particularly the case right here as a result of this can be a lengthy trial,” stated CNN senior authorized analyst Elie Honig, a former federal and state prosecutor.
“This, greater than even your typical case, goes to be a closing case,” he added.
Former New York prosecutor Bernarda Villalona stated prosecutors will use their closing arguments “to inform the story from the very starting.” She stated that not like their opening assertion, which lasted about 40 minutes, prosecutors’ closing remarks within the case might go on for a number of hours and have a visible help like a PowerPoint presentation to assist stroll the jury again by means of a number of the key proof.
“The boring is over. The boring half was having them sit down to listen to it,” added Villalona, referring to the 12 jurors. “Curiously sufficient, the boring half is definitely crucial a part of the case as a result of the boring half is what offers you the paperwork. The star witness on this case are the paperwork, and the paperwork converse for themselves.”
Trump’s attorneys will current their closing arguments first on Tuesday, adopted by the arguments from prosecutors. As soon as either side end their arguments, Decide Juan Merchan will instruct the jury as to the costs it should take into account in opposition to the previous president; then, the jurors will start their deliberations. The choose has stated he expects this to occur on Wednesday.
The closing arguments will start precisely every week after the protection rested its case on Tuesday and greater than 5 weeks after opening statements have been delivered and the primary witness, former tabloid government David Pecker, took the stand.
The prosecution known as 20 witnesses over 19 days in court docket, with their testimony totaling over 50 hours. Lots of their witnesses weren’t family names, although some, together with former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen and grownup movie actress Stormy Daniels — whose alleged affair with Trump is on the heart of the case — have been high-profile figures whose testimony is little question seared into jurors’ minds. (Trump has denied the alleged affair.)
For its half, Trump’s group known as simply two witnesses: a paralegal who entered telephone data into proof and Robert Costello, an lawyer who was in talks with Cohen to characterize him in 2018.
Trump is dealing with 34 felony counts of falsifying enterprise data within the first diploma to cowl up the reimbursement of hush cash funds made earlier than the 2016 election to Daniels. If convicted, Merchan might sentence Trump to probation or a sentence of 1 1/3 to 4 years on every depend in state jail, with a most of 20 years.
Prosecutors will possible contend throughout their closing arguments that every of their witnesses performs a key position within the case, regardless of their skilled rank or proximity to the alleged crimes. They may most likely additionally must push again in opposition to claims by the protection that Cohen, prosecutors’ star witness, undermines their case due to his history of dishonesty, Honig stated.
“The prosecution’s argument shall be that every one the proof interlocks and is corroborated and that you simply don’t must depend on anyone witness’s phrase by itself. They may say this can be a paperwork case,” he defined, happening to explain the varied accounting paperwork introduced through the trial.
“They usually’ll say, ‘Michael Cohen’s right here to information you thru it, however you don’t must imagine him — the whole lot he says is backed up’” by proof and different testimony, Honig stated.
Throughout the trial, prosecutors walked jurors repeatedly by means of the 11 invoices, 12 vouchers and 11 checks — the 34 paperwork that make up the falsified enterprise data costs — that have been used to pay Cohen $420,000 in 2017, cash that included the reimbursement for the $130,000 hush cash cost “grossed up” to account for taxes.
Prosecutors confirmed jurors how Cohen despatched the Trump Group month-to-month invoices for $35,000, which have been processed by the Trump company’s controller so checks could possibly be minimize. Trump signed 9 of the 11 checks. (The opposite two checks have been paid from Trump’s revocable belief and signed by former Trump Org. Chief Monetary Officer Allen Weisselberg and certainly one of Trump’s sons.)
Karen Friedman Agnifilo, who served for a time as a prime prosecutor within the Manhattan District Lawyer’s Workplace, stated she expects the prosecution to current a number of themes of their closing arguments, together with that most people who testified for his or her case have been “Trump witnesses … who you’ll count on to be pleasant to him.”
The opposite theme, she stated, could possibly be: “Have a look at the sort of individuals Trump values,” with prosecutors arguing the previous president selected to encompass himself with individuals similar to Cohen and Pecker, who have been doing Trump’s bidding forward of the 2016 election.
“These are his individuals, he selected them. And he shouldn’t now get the advantage of, ‘As a result of they’re flawed you possibly can’t depend on them,’” prosecutors would possibly argue, Agnifilo stated.
“And even when you don’t depend on them,” she stated, echoing Honig, “the third theme goes to be, ‘You don’t must, as a result of the whole lot is corroborated both by different witnesses or paperwork or data or Trump’s personal phrases.’”
The size of the trial could not in the end show to be a lot of a problem for jurors throughout their deliberations, Villalona stated, since they have been allowed to jot down notes through the proceedings and can be capable to request some components of the trial be learn again to them.
“The benefit of New York is that they might request to have the entire trial learn again to them and the choose will do this,” she stated. “So in the event that they forgot one thing David Pecker stated on Day 1 or 2 of the trial, they’ll have that learn again.” She added that any of the reveals put into proof is also despatched to the jurors for them to take a better look as they mull a verdict.
Nonetheless, the closing arguments from all sides shall be rigorously crafted to win not solely a verdict of their favor, but in addition to mark every attorneys’ place within the historic trial, Villalona mused.
“The prosecution and the protection goes to offer the closing argument of their profession,” she stated.
CNN’s Jeremy Herb, Kara Scannell and Lauren del Valle contributed to this report.