CNN
—
President Joe Biden has revived a debunked story about his previous – his fictional declare that he used to drive an 18-wheeler truck.
Biden has repeatedly embellished or invented biographical tidbits. In 2021, he claimed throughout a tour of a Mack Vehicles facility: “I used to drive an 18-wheeler, man,” then added, “I obtained to.” At a separate 2021 occasion, he told school college students learning truck expertise, “I used to drive a tractor-trailer,” including, “I solely did it for a part of a summer season, however I obtained my license anyway.”
Biden’s claims had been fact-checked at the time as false. However on Tuesday, throughout a marketing campaign occasion in Florida, Biden said it again.
A supporter advised him, “The one cause I’ve a pension is due to you.” (The supporter seemed to be referring to the Biden administration’s $36 billion in help to forestall steep pension cuts for greater than 350,000 union workers and retirees, including truck drivers.) Biden responded: “Properly, we did get that accomplished. Anyway. Apart from, I used to drive an 18-wheeler.”
Info First: Biden’s declare stays unfaithful. There isn’t any proof he ever drove an 18-wheeler.
When CNN inquired in regards to the declare in 2021, the White Home noted that Biden as soon as had a part-time job driving a college bus (which isn’t an 18-wheeler or a tractor-trailer) and that, as a US senator in 1973, he spent an evening using in a cargo truck (not driving it).
Biden’s Tuesday rendition of the “18-wheeler” declare got here the week after he made another inaccurate personal claims throughout a marketing campaign swing in Pennsylvania.
He stated final week that he has “by no means” earned $400,000 in a yr, although he has accomplished so yearly of his presidency and made hundreds of thousands in every of 2017 and 2018. He additionally provided a dramatic account of the loss of life of his uncle in a World Struggle II aircraft crash – saying the aircraft was shot down and suggesting his uncle’s physique was consumed by cannibals – that’s at odds with the Protection Division’s account of the 1944 incident.